Culture × personality library

The culture guide: how cultures communicate, decide and trust

89 culture guides built on the eight scales from Erin Meyer’s The Culture Map, Edward T. Hall’s high- and low-context communication and Geert Hofstede’s value research. Search a culture, a region or a style such as “direct feedback” or “flexible time”.

Add your culture to your free personality card →

Free to start. Add up to three cultural backgrounds.

Africa

  • Nigerian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Moroccan
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Ghanaian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Tanzanian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • South African
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Egyptian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Kenyan
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Ethiopian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time

Caribbean

  • Cuban
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Dominican
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Haitian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Jamaican
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time

East Asia

  • Chinese
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Japanese
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Korean
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Mongolian
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Taiwanese
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans linear time

Europe

  • German
    • Strongly low-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • French
    • Strongly low-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Italian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Portuguese
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Spanish
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Dutch
    • Strongly low-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Scandinavian
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Greek
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Swiss
    • Strongly low-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Austrian
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Polish
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Czech
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Hungarian
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Romanian
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Ukrainian
    • Between low-context and high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • English
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Scottish
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Welsh
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Northern Irish
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Albanian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Bosnian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Bulgarian
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Croatian
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Kosovar
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Montenegrin
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • North Macedonian
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Serbian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Slovenian
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Irish
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Finnish
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Swedish
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Norwegian
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Danish
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Icelandic
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Belgian
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Russian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Slovak
    • Between low-context and high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Between linear time and flexible time
  • Estonian
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Latvian
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Lithuanian
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Leans linear time
  • Maltese
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Between linear time and flexible time

Latin America

  • Brazilian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time

Middle East

  • Saudi Arabian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Emirati
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Turkish
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Iranian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Lebanese
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Israeli
    • Strongly low-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time

North America

  • American
    • Leans low-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Canadian
    • Leans low-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time
  • Mexican
    • Leans high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time

Oceania

  • Fijian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Hawaiian
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • New Zealand
    • Leans low-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time

South America

  • Chilean
    • Leans high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Venezuelan
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Argentinian
    • Between low-context and high-context
    • Leans indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Colombian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Peruvian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time

South Asia

  • Indian
    • Leans high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Nepali
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Pakistani
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Bangladeshi
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Sri Lankan
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time

Southeast Asia

  • Myanmar/Burmese
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Cambodian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Thai
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Vietnamese
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Leans flexible time
  • Filipino
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Indonesian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Strongly direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Malaysian
    • Strongly high-context
    • Leans direct negative feedback
    • Strongly flexible time
  • Singaporean
    • Leans high-context
    • Between direct negative feedback and indirect negative feedback
    • Strongly linear time

The eight scales, in plain language

Erin Meyer’s central lesson is that culture is relative. Nobody is simply “direct”; they are more direct than someone else. Each guide places a culture on the same eight scales so you can compare two backgrounds side by side.

Communicating: low-context vs high-context

Is the message in the words or around them? Low-context communication says the point plainly and repeats it so nothing is missed. High-context communication trusts shared background, tone and timing to carry meaning, so what is left unsaid matters.

Builds on Edward T. Hall’s high- and low-context idea from Beyond Culture (1976).

Evaluating: direct negative feedback vs indirect negative feedback

How is negative feedback delivered? This scale is about criticism specifically. Direct cultures name the problem frankly, sometimes in front of others. Indirect cultures soften, wrap it in positives, or deliver it privately.

Erin Meyer separates this from everyday communication: a culture can be explicit in general yet gentle with criticism.

Persuading: applications-first vs principles-first

Do arguments start with theory or with examples? Applications-first audiences want the conclusion and practical examples early. Principles-first audiences want the reasoning and concept built before reaching a recommendation.

Echoes long-standing contrasts between deductive and inductive reasoning traditions.

Leading: egalitarian vs hierarchical

How much distance sits between a boss and a team? Egalitarian settings keep status differences small: people skip levels and challenge managers openly. Hierarchical settings respect formal rank, titles and the right channel.

Related to Geert Hofstede’s power distance dimension.

Deciding: consensual vs top-down

Who makes the call, and how final is it? Consensual cultures take time to bring everyone along, then treat decisions as firm. Top-down cultures let the leader decide quickly, and decisions may be revisited as things change.

Meyer notes that egalitarian leading and consensual deciding do not always go together.

Trusting: task-based trust vs relationship-based trust

Is trust built through work or through relationship? Task-based trust comes from reliable, competent work, and is easy to build and drop. Relationship-based trust grows from shared meals, time and personal connection, and lasts longer once formed.

Connects to the cognitive versus affective trust distinction in organizational research.

Disagreeing: open disagreement vs avoids confrontation

Is open debate healthy or harmful? Some cultures see vigorous debate as a way to find the best idea without harming the relationship. Others see open disagreement as damaging to harmony and handle it privately or indirectly.

Meyer treats this as separate from feedback: a culture can debate openly yet criticize gently.

Scheduling: linear time vs flexible time

Is time a fixed line or a flexible space? Linear-time cultures move step by step, value punctuality and stick to agendas. Flexible-time cultures treat plans as adaptable, handle several things at once and put relationships ahead of the clock.

Echoes Edward T. Hall’s monochronic and polychronic time from The Dance of Life (1983).

The books and researchers behind this library

Each guide draws on widely used cross-cultural frameworks. Read the originals for depth; the summaries here are ours.

  • Erin Meyer, The Culture Map (2014). Eight practical scales for how cultures communicate, give feedback, persuade, lead, decide, trust, disagree and schedule. Her core lesson: positions are relative, so what matters is the gap between two cultures.
  • Edward T. Hall, Beyond Culture (1976) and The Dance of Life (1983). High- versus low-context communication and monochronic versus polychronic time, two ideas that still anchor cross-cultural training.
  • Geert Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences (1980); Cultures and Organizations (with G. J. Hofstede and M. Minkov). National value dimensions such as individualism, power distance and uncertainty avoidance, drawn from large workplace surveys.
  • Fons Trompenaars and Charles Hampden-Turner, Riding the Waves of Culture. Seven dilemmas, including universalism versus particularism and neutral versus emotional expression, about how cultures resolve competing values.
  • Richard D. Lewis, When Cultures Collide (1996). The Lewis model groups cultures as linear-active, multi-active and reactive, which is useful for meetings and negotiation.
  • The GLOBE study, Culture, Leadership, and Organizations (House et al., 2004). Research across 62 societies on how cultural values shape what people expect from leaders.
  • P. Christopher Earley, Soon Ang and David Livermore, Cultural Intelligence (2003); Leading with Cultural Intelligence (2009). Cultural intelligence (CQ) treats adapting across cultures as a skill that can be learned, not a fixed trait.
  • Hazel Rose Markus and Shinobu Kitayama, “Culture and the Self,” Psychological Review (1991). Independent and interdependent views of the self, linking culture to how people understand their own personality.

Using AI to prepare for cross-cultural conversations

AI chat tools are good at summarizing frameworks and drafting questions. They are worse at nuance: they can repeat stereotypes, miss regional and generational differences, and sound more certain than the research is. Every culture guide includes a prompt that asks the AI to explain tendencies and where individuals differ, and to suggest questions to ask the person directly.

On Tarock, your cultural backgrounds sit next to your MBTI-style type and Big Five traits. When you match with a friend, partner or coworker, compatibility compares both personality and culture profiles across these scales. AI relationship readings require an accepted match.

Use with care

Scale positions are Tarock editorial estimates informed by published cross-cultural research, including the eight scales Erin Meyer describes in The Culture Map. They are not Erin Meyer’s own placements, are not affiliated with or endorsed by her, and describe broad tendencies, never individuals.

Questions people ask

What are the eight scales of The Culture Map?

Erin Meyer’s eight scales are communicating (low- vs high-context), evaluating (direct vs indirect negative feedback), persuading (applications- vs principles-first), leading (egalitarian vs hierarchical), deciding (consensual vs top-down), trusting (task- vs relationship-based), disagreeing (confrontational vs avoids confrontation) and scheduling (linear vs flexible time).

What is the difference between high-context and low-context cultures?

In low-context cultures, good communication is explicit and repeated so the message is clear from the words alone. In high-context cultures, meaning relies on shared background, tone and what is left unsaid. Edward T. Hall introduced the distinction; Meyer uses it as her first scale.

Are these Erin Meyer’s own country placements?

No. The positions are Tarock editorial estimates informed by published research, including Meyer’s scales. They are not her placements and are not endorsed by her. Use them as conversation starters, not verdicts.

Does culture change your personality?

Culture shapes how traits are expressed, such as how openly you disagree or how you show warmth, more than it rewrites the traits themselves. Bicultural people often switch styles between settings. Tarock lets you add up to three cultural backgrounds to your personality card for that reason.

Can AI explain cultural differences accurately?

AI chat tools can summarize frameworks quickly, but they can also repeat stereotypes and flatten differences inside a country. Use AI to prepare questions, then check what you learn with the actual person.

Found this useful? Pass it on.

Share this guide with someone who would enjoy it. Each post includes a link to the free test.

Take the Test →

Free to start. See your personality card before creating an account.